Why man works? What's the valuable purpose of man work? Man works usually to get the necessities and basics like any other animal.
Why man learn? Man learns - and this is one of learning purposes - to be able to use this knowledge in making something useful of things humans use in their life.
So, what's a song, movie, book, literature ... etc useful for?! They are not like foods and material stuff man uses.
The person who learned about universe and gathered a mental image and painted it or played it as music or wrote it as a writing work, gives world a vision.
What do you think people work for every day? Food, mobiles, material stuff, basics and necessities and some of welfare.
***
Points in the consideration:
Civilization
Federalism
habitation and preparing
Congress
skyscraper
Arts:
of computer calculations of a company
of war
of sport
of painting
of making movie or show
of computer art works
of music
of writing
of thinking
of science
of visions of looking in the universe and science
... etc
It seems the purpose of man in this life is to learn and to make everything with artistic way. Food and silly material stuff of man are like a purpose or a reason to push man to discover artistic ways to make 'em. There are some details in the consideration like the world becoming like a small village and the big number of people to provide 'em the products.
***
I want to learn database, but why, I'm not an employee in a company?
Database is an intellectual art, the employee dose it - for example - to manage the data of some silly material products. That silly material products are a realistic reason to use database. The employee learn art of database and gain its art and money, I'll do the same and gain the art of database but I won't gain money. Perhaps, the purpose of the process of company in life is just gaining arts by reasons of work, so I'm doing this noble reason without money, but I'll be hungry for that I've no money :)
***
I didn't say that I'm intelligent, not because humility, but because I really don't know this about myself. I've not the pride of life, but I'm asking my thinking if it's the real valuable thing to be, and how a miserable dark dirty ugly poor low-level life like mine can yield so intelligent thoughts not in highest floor at Skyscrapers in country such as America. When I prove that, I prove that thoughts are real power and it won't be valuable if I've pride of life with lacking powerful thoughts.
***
Making a model - for example - for a house may include some principles of making real one in reality, it has a part of that art. Another art is to make the model to imagine how the real one will be in reality.
***
The job of constitution can be the framework and general principles of next levels of law.
***
Artistic words an artist says are valuable for the purpose of man is learning and behaving art in life, so the artist is doing the purpose of this philosophy. Without the need of making material product as a proof.
***
People pay to watch a sport match, the players didn't just play, they had trained professionally, so they make art in their playing in the match, so people is paying to watch an art, and this is not like a silly material stuff. Games themselves have goals like - for example - the basketball whose goal to put the ball in the basket, and this is not a material stuff too, it's just a purpose to make the art of playing itself which people pay - in fact- to watch.
***
***
Ignorant individual who made a fool crime because anger and being not able to function to solve his problem, someone can say about him that he's no mind, but this comment can mean that that ignorant criminal isn't surrendered to a kind of system. Man isn't an animal that must surrender to something, but that ignorant criminal has no art in his evil and if he's an art, maybe he would solve his problem in artistic wise way. It's the darkness of ignorance that make man lose the gift of learning an art in his life, so he can't think appropriately and in beautiful way.
***
A beautiful bottle of tasty juice is in fact a simple material stuff, and man can live without it, but people liked it, they'll pay for it, so a lot of money can come from this simple material stuff, so it'll be a simple reason to build huge company that use complex artistic ways to produce these bottles. The most valuable thing in this huge process is the collections of arts employees and workers gain. The money will be sugar piece you give students to learn art.
***
***
***
I didn't say that I'm intelligent, not because humility, but because I really don't know this about myself. I've not the pride of life, but I'm asking my thinking if it's the real valuable thing to be, and how a miserable dark dirty ugly poor low-level life like mine can yield so intelligent thoughts not in highest floor at Skyscrapers in country such as America. When I prove that, I prove that thoughts are real power and it won't be valuable if I've pride of life with lacking powerful thoughts.
***
Making a model - for example - for a house may include some principles of making real one in reality, it has a part of that art. Another art is to make the model to imagine how the real one will be in reality.
***
The job of constitution can be the framework and general principles of next levels of law.
***
Artistic words an artist says are valuable for the purpose of man is learning and behaving art in life, so the artist is doing the purpose of this philosophy. Without the need of making material product as a proof.
***
People pay to watch a sport match, the players didn't just play, they had trained professionally, so they make art in their playing in the match, so people is paying to watch an art, and this is not like a silly material stuff. Games themselves have goals like - for example - the basketball whose goal to put the ball in the basket, and this is not a material stuff too, it's just a purpose to make the art of playing itself which people pay - in fact- to watch.
***
My new philosophy:
Many of man works are to product silly material stuff, that stuff are cheap in their own value or simple and don't deserve that huge effort man make to produce 'em. Yes, man makes another degrees and levels of those stuff but the low levels or the basics can do the job of feeding the needs of man, for example, man made factories to product high and artistic clothes but simple and cheap clothes can do the job like what we see in poor people clothes. These material stuffs are cheap although man can do high degrees of 'em, they don't deserve to be the purpose and the aim of man's life. Animals and non-educated persons seek such stuff and they are their purpose in life. Having much of these stuffs and money make the pride of life, the pride of life is mortal glory and can't be real noble purpose for man in this life. Money helps man to be independent in his life that he make him able to buy all of his material needs and no to be in need to lean on others, but money also is a tool to buy the same silly material stuff, so money is silly material stuff too, and it can't be the purpose of man in his life although it's so necessary for man life in modern society but it'll be like basics and necessities. Material stuff making itself is an artistic processes and this is what I think the valuable point man gain. So, in this philosophy, man's purpose in life is the art, learning it and doing it, thinking by it and gaining it. Man is just an artist, even the crimes, we see artistic crimes and fool crimes. There are various degrees of art among people in every society depending on the level of that society and among different societies themselves.
The money, needs, conditions and silly material stuff are reasons for man to use the art to make 'em.
The money, needs, conditions and silly material stuff are reasons for man to use the art to make 'em.
***
Ignorant individual who made a fool crime because anger and being not able to function to solve his problem, someone can say about him that he's no mind, but this comment can mean that that ignorant criminal isn't surrendered to a kind of system. Man isn't an animal that must surrender to something, but that ignorant criminal has no art in his evil and if he's an art, maybe he would solve his problem in artistic wise way. It's the darkness of ignorance that make man lose the gift of learning an art in his life, so he can't think appropriately and in beautiful way.
***
A beautiful bottle of tasty juice is in fact a simple material stuff, and man can live without it, but people liked it, they'll pay for it, so a lot of money can come from this simple material stuff, so it'll be a simple reason to build huge company that use complex artistic ways to produce these bottles. The most valuable thing in this huge process is the collections of arts employees and workers gain. The money will be sugar piece you give students to learn art.
***
I add new points for my new philosophy that looks to man's purpose in life as if it's the art.
Principle of idealism: Man is seeking idealism in his doing the art, it's not just - for example - we make a product with particular way but with perfection as we can to reach a particular ideal paradigm.
Paradigm: The ideal image or perfect measurements of doing something, it works with the idealism principle.
Principle of reality or realism: If we have a paradigm, our situation or equipment can't allow us to done that paradigm in its perfect way, but we are done the most perfect thing allowed in our situation.
Example:
From the principle of idealism we'll seek to make a perfect show, we have a paradigm, some unique American movies, they are the best example in this field, but we can't do like those shows with our limited resources, so we do the best possible show with our possible resources and that American shows are our paradigms, and this is of the principle of reality.
***
- In superego of man, he learn to use his ideals in criticism, he can learn right or wrong ideals and depending on that he'll think and look to himself or others in reality.
***
I'll add some points in life of art philosophy:
- Nature is ideal and realistic in the same time. It's perfections and agrees with reality and its requirements.
Criticism in this philosophy:
- In superego of man, he learn to use his ideals in criticism, he can learn right or wrong ideals and depending on that he'll think and look to himself or others in reality.
- Man who's no art of doing anything is like an empty person or invaluable person, a person without aim in life, cheap one.
- Some people have no paradigm, they are lost in life, or they have inappropriate one, they are deceived and act ugly works because they have fake measurements of idealism. A problem in idealism and realism principles.
- Some people have hopes of pride of life, lust of flesh or lust of eyes without learning an art to reach to their aims, and their aims can't be considered as paradigms. Their way is against the realism principle, they do no art in reality.
***
An example in life of art philosophy for new points:
In basket ball game we have:
1. Determined area of game, the playground.
2. One ball with one purpose.
3. Decided known laws of game.
4. Contradiction and preventing with two teams.
5. Competition and it comes from step 4.
So, everything were decided and known, we have nothing new, but the new will come is the various forms of playing to success the purpose of the game.
If there's no contradiction nor preventing, there's no art and no meaning in the art to put the ball in the basket, but with the trying of preventing, there's sense to make artistic ways of playing.
The laws of game decide too the art of game.
***
***
Cars are not complex like computers. I've no clear information that middle east made pure car. How that although I assume that making car with its basics isn't that complex. Why they failed to make one good car with car's basics. I'm not talking about Limousine, I'm talking about good basic car.
Depending on life of art philosophy, what they are lacking of the art of making pure primary car.
***
***
They said there's a car made in Saudi Arabia, I looked to it, maybe it's the form of idealism, maybe it lacks the realism principles, to make good car like American one isn't by the ideal form but care in realism, a car with perfect points and agree and deal with reality. There's money in Saudi case that can bring what it's needed of science and materials to make pure car. I afraid that it's in the end must to be imitation.
In Egyptian case I saw, the car has no any fancy in its form, it was a try to make a car with its basics, but it's no idealism and maybe can't deal with reality as it's supposed to be.
***
***
- In civil government system, we have a paradigm of ideal civil country, and we have also conditions of reality of particular place that impact in the way we form with the ideal civilization in reality of this place.
- In law forming we have ideal principles and reality conditions.
***
***
Another points for life of art philosophy to study:
- Dose homosexuality make the artist invaluable although good art he knows and dose?
- Dose making love with a woman make her value less, is the woman less than man in the life of art philosophy?
- Why we feel like that in previous points?
***
***
Another point in life of art philosophy:
- The construction and function or behaviour.
We can see three rabbits - for example - and each one has the same construction of the other, where's the art? Is it in the construction itself or in the functions of the rabbits?
In fact, both of construction and function are connected; depending on the construction, the function will be and we'll have various forms of the rabbit behaviours in different situations.
***
***
We can add purpose of construction with construction and function.
We notice that car has a construction like the rabbit has a one, but rabbit has instincts and spirit, but car has a driver rather than that.
***
Comparison of horse with rider and car with driver vs rabbit with instinct and spirit and car with driver.
***
Tools of mechanic equipment box - for example - are like new organs you add to your body and make new arts, but a car is like a creature.
***
The hockey player has a change in the construction for the game purposes, he has stuffs of protection in his clothes and clothes manner that makes him the creature of hockey :) and stick, a new organ.
***
Police man learns in the academic level the theory; with practice learns to apply the theory in reality to gain some skills and the ability to run the theory in reality; he gains some experience; in real crimes invasions, he build the real experience. He'll have art and experience of that art.
***
We know now that it was weak thinking when a child wished to be police man to beat guys; now, we know it's kind of art for a purpose.
***
***
***
I found a problem to consider the kite as a bird because its solidity but I found the car has the same problem when we compare it with animals we ride. Anyway, man-made things are based on mathematical formulas but natural things are based on natural formulas.
***
Children should learn and play games. It's a way to train 'em early to gain arts and the nature and skills of accepting learning how things work. We see many adult people in many countries who have no art of thinking nor of doing anything.
***
***
***
It's not wise to learn how to use tools of fixing a mother board without knowing first what's mother board and its construction and how it works.
***
***
***
You hear news about someone that he's bad or ugly or behaving inappropriately. You know that's not what's supposed to be because you have a paradigm for that person and his paradigm tells that he's an artist.
***
Criticism:
In production line, the aim is the products, every worker has his role, if a worker made more than one role, it'll be not fair, because another worker doesn't do his role, and it means that we focus in the work of the worker not the production. It's good if the worker dose his work without suffering, but if we said he must suffer to prove that he works, we again focus on worker not the production, no sense, it's unconscious way of looking to work. Exchange the roles of the manager doesn't like the current order, but don't make a worker doing two roles without necessary, if you thought this worker doesn't work, so his role is more than what work needs, so make him leave the work at all and look if the work missed him after that or not. You don't understand, you focus in worker, not the production, and this is wrong. There's no art when we say the purpose of the work is to make the worker work and he must prove that. The final production is the aim and purpose, it's the proof.
What's production in few words, it's producing a product, it's not just make the worker work anything, it's the effective work of a worker in his role that helps the final product to be, so the unconscious work like just making the worker just work anything makes the worker the subject of the production process. The product isn't made because the worker works anything or keep working, it's because the worker is doing his role in the production process to yield the product. The product is the subject, not the worker. Keep the worker works, this is what will produce the production, no sense in this. What the worker is doing and what's it for, this is the questions to figure out what will make our product.
Example, suppose a factory is making pampers for babes, the manager or supervisor asks the new worker "do you know what we are doing here?", the final product - for example - is pampers, we have production line, do you know what production line means? now there are many stations in this line, A B C ... etc, your work - for example - is in station E, you receive works from D and prepare the product for station F, you have a role. Now, when the worker make a fault that prevent producing in the line as what it supposed to be, it'll be a sensible problem belongs to our production but if the worker just keep working anything, what dose this mean? what's it useful in for our product?!! it's not by working anything or just working what will make the product, it's the effective sensible work of worker in his role.
If we have a Jewish worker in our factory, and we decided to fuc* him, but we have to make him chose that as his free decision, we don't talk about art nor work here, we are talking about something so ugly. We are talking about crime or war. It can be another art too.
***
Now, the philosophy of life of art can be applied with some way on some good fields in life like sport, music, movies, industry and companies, and some inventions. It can be used to criticize some situations and form of thinking.
***
In "Get hard" movie also, Will in comedy part of the movie went to prison for 6 months but he was prepared for this experience and got real experience, he changed or by other words he gained the art of that level and that places. It's kind of art he was lacking before in his welfare life.
Also in "Get hard" movie, Kevin hasn't a real experience about prison, he doesn't know about that art, he asked someone was in prison to gain of his experience. It's academic level to get knowledge about kind of art.
***
In basket ball game, the art that happens in a match is the data of the analysis.
***
***
***
***
***
Comparison of horse with rider and car with driver vs rabbit with instinct and spirit and car with driver.
***
Tools of mechanic equipment box - for example - are like new organs you add to your body and make new arts, but a car is like a creature.
***
The hockey player has a change in the construction for the game purposes, he has stuffs of protection in his clothes and clothes manner that makes him the creature of hockey :) and stick, a new organ.
***
Police man learns in the academic level the theory; with practice learns to apply the theory in reality to gain some skills and the ability to run the theory in reality; he gains some experience; in real crimes invasions, he build the real experience. He'll have art and experience of that art.
***
We know now that it was weak thinking when a child wished to be police man to beat guys; now, we know it's kind of art for a purpose.
***
Writing is a speaking on a paper and pen is the tongue.
(Life of art philosophy)
***
***
I'm in our small shop in the house, I wanted to make a cup of tea in the kitchen, my problem is that there's a possible cat can come to the house from door A of the shop and if it come in door C, it'll be so difficult to bring it out of the house which has many stories, I found it a silly problem like linear programming in math.
The object is: To make a cup of tea
The constraints:
- Don't make the cat invade the house
- Watch the shop every time from the kitchen.
If I closed door B, I won't be able to watch the shop.
If I keep watching and in the same time go to see the boiling water, it's possible for a cat in invade the house.
If I closed the door C, the cat can invade only one apartment that I'm in and it'll be so possible to bring it out. This is the best solution.
Although, it's silly problem but it had an art. I'm thinking now where's the part of art in thinking.
***
I found problems to apply my philosophy in many things, but I'm trying.
I found a problem for example to define a kite, and I found it like a bird, and child plays with it gives it the spirit and instincts, the playing itself is the art, maybe its purpose to keep it flying. I didn't play this game well yet.
I found a problem to consider the kite as a bird because its solidity but I found the car has the same problem when we compare it with animals we ride. Anyway, man-made things are based on mathematical formulas but natural things are based on natural formulas.
***
Children should learn and play games. It's a way to train 'em early to gain arts and the nature and skills of accepting learning how things work. We see many adult people in many countries who have no art of thinking nor of doing anything.
***
I tried to make a game with cards. Every time, you pick three cards:
- If there's no heart nor spade in your three cards, you take 1 point
- If there's a heart or more, you take 1 point for each heart cards + 1 point of the thrown three cards you take normally.
- If there's a spade or more, you take -1 point for each card.
- When you start the game, you've 5 points free in your score.
Suppose that you picked 3 cards, one of 'em is heart and there's no spade, your score will be 5 + 1 +1
Suppose that you picked 3 cards, one of 'em is spade, your score will be 7 + 1 - 1
... etc
I looked to some machines and tools to figure how can we define 'em, and I found that the appropriate thing to classify 'em as tools and machines of production line.
For example: The woman who makes a cake in kitchen, uses oven, blender to make the Chantilly cream, knife and good dishes for presenting the cake, fridge to save the cake to the time of presenting, washing machine after that all ... etc , it's like a production line.
***
It's not wise to learn how to use tools of fixing a mother board without knowing first what's mother board and its construction and how it works.
***
What's about furniture and houses?
I think it all belongs to needs of living actions in a place like house or apartment. Stuff for meeting and inviting others, watching TV, eating, sleeping, bathroom ... etc
It all belongs to the planning of place and its construction.
Things we didn't discuss yet, the construction of place, stage, arena, field of war, playground.
The place of artistic actions has a construction and planning.
You hear news about someone that he's bad or ugly or behaving inappropriately. You know that's not what's supposed to be because you have a paradigm for that person and his paradigm tells that he's an artist.
***
Criticism:
In production line, the aim is the products, every worker has his role, if a worker made more than one role, it'll be not fair, because another worker doesn't do his role, and it means that we focus in the work of the worker not the production. It's good if the worker dose his work without suffering, but if we said he must suffer to prove that he works, we again focus on worker not the production, no sense, it's unconscious way of looking to work. Exchange the roles of the manager doesn't like the current order, but don't make a worker doing two roles without necessary, if you thought this worker doesn't work, so his role is more than what work needs, so make him leave the work at all and look if the work missed him after that or not. You don't understand, you focus in worker, not the production, and this is wrong. There's no art when we say the purpose of the work is to make the worker work and he must prove that. The final production is the aim and purpose, it's the proof.
What's production in few words, it's producing a product, it's not just make the worker work anything, it's the effective work of a worker in his role that helps the final product to be, so the unconscious work like just making the worker just work anything makes the worker the subject of the production process. The product isn't made because the worker works anything or keep working, it's because the worker is doing his role in the production process to yield the product. The product is the subject, not the worker. Keep the worker works, this is what will produce the production, no sense in this. What the worker is doing and what's it for, this is the questions to figure out what will make our product.
Example, suppose a factory is making pampers for babes, the manager or supervisor asks the new worker "do you know what we are doing here?", the final product - for example - is pampers, we have production line, do you know what production line means? now there are many stations in this line, A B C ... etc, your work - for example - is in station E, you receive works from D and prepare the product for station F, you have a role. Now, when the worker make a fault that prevent producing in the line as what it supposed to be, it'll be a sensible problem belongs to our production but if the worker just keep working anything, what dose this mean? what's it useful in for our product?!! it's not by working anything or just working what will make the product, it's the effective sensible work of worker in his role.
If we have a Jewish worker in our factory, and we decided to fuc* him, but we have to make him chose that as his free decision, we don't talk about art nor work here, we are talking about something so ugly. We are talking about crime or war. It can be another art too.
***
Now, the philosophy of life of art can be applied with some way on some good fields in life like sport, music, movies, industry and companies, and some inventions. It can be used to criticize some situations and form of thinking.
***
Let's analyze "Get hard" movie depending on life of art philosophy. Law of country makes a system in its state, Nelson made an art, he gained illegal money and made Will Ferrell bear the responsibility without he knows; another part of art is when Will by Kevin help tries to prove that he's not guilty and gets the proof. The state is the playground with the crime rules.
Another part of art, when Will was sure that he'll go to prison, he's no idea about that place (art) rules and nature, he asked Kevin to prepare him for prison for some money to solve Kevin problem. The prison is another internal area in the state with it's rules and needs another kind of art.
Another art is Kevin tries to improve his living, the art of living in civil place.
In "Get hard" movie also, Will in comedy part of the movie went to prison for 6 months but he was prepared for this experience and got real experience, he changed or by other words he gained the art of that level and that places. It's kind of art he was lacking before in his welfare life.
Also in "Get hard" movie, Kevin hasn't a real experience about prison, he doesn't know about that art, he asked someone was in prison to gain of his experience. It's academic level to get knowledge about kind of art.
***
In basket ball game, the art that happens in a match is the data of the analysis.
***
In computer program graphics demo, you put rules of art, mathematics equations of how objects can act on the screen.
In basketball game, the players act depending on rules they know and the coach vision.
In a company, linear programming can be used with its art rules to give many visions of how things are going on.
***
***
Kid asks his father for some tools, like sport tools, modern calculator, good computer ... etc, but gaining tools doesn't mean gaining their arts, you have to learn arts that use these tools to make these tools effective and useful for your work otherwise these tools will be useless. I think it belongs to the principle of reality.
(Life of art philosophy)
***
Having art tools doesn't mean you gained the art itself.
(Life of art philosophy)
***
It's not necessary at all to know much mathematics to learn good programming, but it's the principle of idealism, it's ideal to be strong in mathematics to be able to program high artistic programs. Put a paradigm for this idealism.
Paradigm of ideal model provides measurements that you use to judge your work nobility.
(Life of art philosophy)
***
Mathematics is the abstracted skeleton of the art of a matter, and a particular matter is the incarnation of mathematics rules.
(Life of art philosophy)
No comments:
Post a Comment